First, there are so many things to say about this horrifying investigation into a Florida lead smelter, written by Corey Johnson, Rebecca Woolington, and Eli Murray at the Tampa Bay Times. Read the whole thing, because virtually every paragraph brings another appalling revelation and a summary can’t do it justice. Here are two of seven key investigative findings, but the stories of the people impacted—including the children of workers who got lead poisoning from dust tracked home by their parents—are critical:
- Eight out of 10 workers from 2014 to 2018 had enough lead in their blood to put them at risk of increased blood pressure, kidney dysfunction or cardiovascular disease. In the past five years, at least 14 current and former workers have had heart attacks or strokes, some after working in the most contaminated areas of the plant. One employee spent more than three decades around the poison before dying of heart and kidney disease at 56.
- Gopher knew its factory had too much lead dust, but the company disabled ventilation features that captured fumes and moved slowly to fix faulty mechanical systems. Workers were left vulnerable, wearing respirators that couldn’t protect them when poison levels spiked. In 2019, one employee faced an air-lead concentration 15 times beyond what his respirator could guard against.
One key thought I want associated with this story is that this is why we need local newspapers. The Tampa Bay Times clearly put a lot of resources into this very important story that otherwise might not have gotten attention.
Another key thought: Workers need unions. And government workplace safety regulations (which, go figure, often happen because of pressure from groups like unions).
The second piece to which I’d love to direct your attention is by Washington Post columnist Sally Jenkins, following up on the shoddy treatment the NCAA dealt out to the players and teams in the women’s tournament. One argument you will have heard a lot for why the women got substandard weight equipment, food, and even swag bags is that women’s basketball just isn’t profitable. Why, it’s practically an act of charity for them even to have a tournament at all, some people imply. Yeah. About that.
You know how much revenue NCAA Division I women’s basketball generated collectively in 2018-2019? Almost a billion dollars. That’s according to economist Daniel Rascher, a financial analyst for the firm OSKR who studied the NCAA’s self-reported numbers and testified as an expert in the governing body’s ongoing antitrust litigation. “I don’t see how they lose money on it,” he says.
You know how many companies will advertise on ESPN during this women’s tournament, brands that want to be associated with the elegance of stars such as Iowa’s Caitlin Clark and Stanford’s Kiana Williams, who play the game like strings of silk? A total of 77, among them Verizon, Chevrolet, L’Oréal and Nike.
Jenkins has a lot more information despite the NCAA’s efforts to obscure this point. A key quote from a senior vice president of sports revenue management for Disney Advertising Sales: “We’ve been very happy with its performance from both a demand and audience standpoint.”
So often when we’re talking about inequality and injustice, a lot of “facts” are cited to support it as really being fair and reasonable. This goes to show it’s worth looking deeper.